Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 27, 2012 5:12:53 GMT -5
All I'm trying to say is that sometimes, a nice, wet, medicated wipe is a pleasant feeling on the sphincter. But I don't have hemorrhoids, you say. I don't need a medicated wipe, you say.
You shouldn't let a lack of hemorrhoids keep you from feeling clean and comfortable.
|
|
ye5man
New Member
1%
Posts: 7,928
|
Post by ye5man on Oct 30, 2012 8:49:21 GMT -5
Even with technology thousands of years ahead of us, LanaBizarro/RennieCowan would still leave a floater
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 30, 2012 10:28:43 GMT -5
the dog in your sig looks like hes just walked into the shitter after Lana
|
|
jauzman
New Member
SUPERMAN
Posts: 6
|
Post by jauzman on Nov 1, 2012 18:11:51 GMT -5
My gut feeling is,
ROUTH was crap!
Chris Reeve was/is Superman!
Henry looks more than capable and prob will make a fine hero.
My moto is(here we go again)If it aint broke,dont fix it.
My major prob is the SUIT!!!
Update fine,leave his trunks on,it has always been part of the costume.Put it on the New costume and up the color tones a Bit,g ;)t rid of the shit on the cuffs and abs(who designs this shit)
There using old english tales of knights in chain mail and crap,to do the krypton history(NOLAN CRAP).Batmans costume is crap,all rubber like and then a bloody curtain for a cape....come on.
I believe it will be a great story,good actors except for Lois Lane,
of all the actresses in Hollywood and the great ones pick whats her name Ginger!Too much British input on the Great American Hero(from Krypton...LOL!)
Superman will be re-booted again after this,just hope they give him back his SUIT!!
Shouldn't have fucked with the suit.....might as well have slapped a too-too on him.
Chris Reeve is turning in his grave R.I.P,BOLD SYNGER/NOLAN!!
|
|
Shane
New Member
Posts: 2,031
|
Post by Shane on Nov 1, 2012 20:39:48 GMT -5
LOL Muppet
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2012 20:51:45 GMT -5
My gut feeling is, ROUTH was crap! Chris Reeve was/is Superman! Henry looks more than capable and prob will make a fine hero. My moto is(here we go again)If it aint broke,dont fix it. My major prob is the SUIT!!! Update fine,leave his trunks on,it has always been part of the costume.Put it on the New costume and up the color tones a Bit,g ;)t rid of the shit on the cuffs and abs(who designs this shit) There using old english tales of knights in chain mail and crap,to do the krypton history(NOLAN CRAP).Batmans costume is crap,all rubber like and then a bloody curtain for a cape....come on. I believe it will be a great story,good actors except for Lois Lane, of all the actresses in Hollywood and the great ones pick whats her name Ginger!Too much British input on the Great American Hero(from Krypton...LOL!) Superman will be re-booted again after this,just hope they give him back his SUIT!! Shouldn't have fucked with the suit.....might as well have slapped a too-too on him. Chris Reeve is turning in his grave R.I.P,BOLD SYNGER/NOLAN!!  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2012 22:57:12 GMT -5
My true gut feeling is the majority of the public will say "another Superman movie?" then shrug their shoulders and go watch "Iron Man 3" again.
|
|
|
|
Post by crazy_asian_man on Nov 2, 2012 2:23:55 GMT -5
Highly possible.
For many comic fans who have been familiar with the Marvel superheroes, while the Marvel movies are a treat, the familiarity is there with the material.
For the majority of the public who haven't/don't follow/ed comics, stuff like Iron Man/Thor/Captain America is all fresh territory that has no reference point for them in their past....
But Superman?
Tv shows and movies have given the majority of the public an inkling of who/what Superman's story is.
If given a direct choice to (1) experience a new superhero film that looks good or (2) a reboot of one that's been translated to the small and big screen a few times, I'd assume that they'd prefer the first.
Still...
Batman Begins was a financially successful reboot, and so has Spiderman, so, who knows?
For sure, though, it doesn't FEEL like it's going to be a slam-dunk hit like Dark Knight Rises and/or the Star Wars prequels were going to be.
At least, not from what little we've seen so far.
A mind-blowing trailer could change all that....... could.
I'm like everyone else--- I agree it's time for WB to release something more at this point!
|
|
jauzman
New Member
SUPERMAN
Posts: 6
|
Post by jauzman on Nov 9, 2012 14:42:57 GMT -5
AND FUCK YOU ASSHOLE!!! MUST BE A FUCKN BRIT! RIRA GONA GET YOU FUCKFACE! |
|
jauzman
New Member
SUPERMAN
Posts: 6
|
Post by jauzman on Nov 9, 2012 14:44:13 GMT -5
My gut feeling is, ROUTH was crap! Chris Reeve was/is Superman! Henry looks more than capable and prob will make a fine hero. My moto is(here we go again)If it aint broke,dont fix it. My major prob is the SUIT!!! Update fine,leave his trunks on,it has always been part of the costume.Put it on the New costume and up the color tones a Bit,g ;)t rid of the shit on the cuffs and abs(who designs this shit) There using old english tales of knights in chain mail and crap,to do the krypton history(NOLAN CRAP).Batmans costume is crap,all rubber like and then a bloody curtain for a cape....come on. I believe it will be a great story,good actors except for Lois Lane, of all the actresses in Hollywood and the great ones pick whats her name Ginger!Too much British input on the Great American Hero(from Krypton...LOL!) Superman will be re-booted again after this,just hope they give him back his SUIT!! Shouldn't have fucked with the suit.....might as well have slapped a too-too on him. Chris Reeve is turning in his grave R.I.P,BOLD SYNGER/NOLAN!! ANOTHER FUCKING TWAT!! |
|
|
|
Post by Valentine Smith on Nov 9, 2012 14:50:52 GMT -5
Well, I see you won't be around for long...
|
|
MerM
New Member
Posts: 6,665
|
Post by MerM on Nov 9, 2012 15:07:46 GMT -5
AND FUCK YOU ASSHOLE!!! MUST BE A FUCKN BRIT! RIRA GONA GET YOU FUCKFACE! |
|
Keith
New Member
Posts: 3,238
|
Post by Keith on Nov 9, 2012 16:02:29 GMT -5
;D ;D ;D That was funny.. I needed a good laugh... sigh.
|
|
ye5man
New Member
1%
Posts: 7,928
|
Post by ye5man on Nov 9, 2012 17:02:36 GMT -5
;D ;D ;D ;D Good stuff
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 9, 2012 18:22:29 GMT -5
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 11, 2012 0:54:14 GMT -5
AND FUCK YOU ASSHOLE!!! MUST BE A FUCKN BRIT! RIRA GONA GET YOU FUCKFACE! Thanks. I haven't watched "Commando" in a while, and now I must watch it right this instant. |
|
|
|
Post by SupermanUF on Nov 21, 2012 1:55:47 GMT -5
And to think this is the guy that Christina Hendricks married. Sigh. |
|
|
|
Post by crazy_asian_man on Nov 21, 2012 11:24:40 GMT -5
Current gut feeling for MOS:
That the xmas trailer with the Hobbit will be THE best opportunity to get a general audience excited for this. Hope WB doesn't blow it.
|
|
Metallo
New Member
The worlds finest heroes
Posts: 17,078
|
Post by Metallo on Dec 15, 2012 12:30:01 GMT -5
I think its going to be somewhere between solid and mediocre. My buddy Ryan pointed out that he'll see it but isn't buring with desire to see it because it seems like every comic book film has done what MOS is doing and he wants to see something different done. The movie doesn't seem to be a trend setter (like STM or even Batman Begins or Avengers or Burtons Batman) but more of a trend follower (like The Amazing Spider-man--which was also solid but not "amazing"). As good as Batman Begins was its Box office wasn't mind blowingly impressive. neither was The Amazing Spider-Man's this year. It's hard to guage how the public will desire seeing MOS. The thing in MOS's favor is that WB CANNOT afford to have this film fail. It goes beyond just Superman's future but all DC films. Especially Justice League. I think they are doing what they can to make it better and learning from the mistakes of Superman Returns. The question is does WB really know what they are doing. This is the same studio that released Catwoman after Batman & Robin and released Green Lantern in the year 2011. More than anything they've lucked into picking the right people when they did. Can anyone here give me an instance of when change ISN'T "change for the sake of change?" How about the Marvel flicks! Bucky not being a child, but being Cap's best friend who defends him from bullies? CHANGE FOR THE SAKE OF CHANGE. Man, that really sucked, didn't it? I really wish that Bucky was just a Robin rip-off and a dubious early teenager who for some reason gets to hang out on an army base and...oh, wait...no, that didn't suck at all. Dude they HAD to change that. Not much chance a kid would be allowed to be around army bases in war torn Europe even if he was behind allied lines as a mascot or in a type of ROTC or whatever the heck Bucky was back then. The marvel films have tried to play things pretty straight. Even Thor's "magic." The First Avengers take explained how Bucky could even just so happen to be close to Cap on missions. He still could have worn a costume I guess but since he was now full fledged miltary what would be the point? There was no reason the army would send him with Cap on missions. It streamlined things much more so that not as much effort would be needed to explain things. |
|
|
|
Post by eccentricbeing on Dec 15, 2012 14:02:17 GMT -5
I think its going to be somewhere between solid and mediocre. My buddy Ryan pointed out that he'll see it but isn't buring with desire to see it because it seems like every comic book film has done what MOS is doing and he wants to see something different done. The movie doesn't seem to be a trend setter (like STM or even Batman Begins or Avengers or Burtons Batman) but more of a trend follower (like The Amazing Spider-man--which was also solid but not "amazing"). As good as Batman Begins was its Box office wasn't mind blowingly impressive. neither was The Amazing Spider-Man's this year. It's hard to guage how the public will desire seeing MOS. The thing in MOS's favor is that WB CANNOT afford to have this film fail. It goes beyond just Superman's future but all DC films. Especially Justice League. I think they are doing what they can to make it better and learning from the mistakes of Superman Returns. The question is does WB really know what they are doing. This is the same studio that released Catwoman after Batman & Robin and released Green Lantern in the year 2011. More than anything they've lucked into picking the right people when they did. But honestly....none of the movies you mentioned there were immediately seen as trend setters the moment you saw the trailer for them. Not that I'm saying Man of Steel is going to set some standards, but it's impossible to gauge where this movie will stand in the years to come. From the looks of it, it doesn't actually scream comic book movie to me, but I'm looking at it from a live-action Superman perspective. From a live-action Superman perspective, this movie looks pretty unique and it just may set those standards accordingly. |
|
Metallo
New Member
The worlds finest heroes
Posts: 17,078
|
Post by Metallo on Dec 15, 2012 16:28:07 GMT -5
Not true. Certainly not in the case of STM or Batman.
Name some films that came out before STM and Batman that looked just like what we saw in those respective trailers. There aren't many. Give me a costume that looked like Keatons from a superhero film or even a film. Something that looked like Fursts Gotham or Batmobile. Even in the trailers you could tell these films were something different. MOS's trailer doesn't look that different from even other Superhero films. The costume; we've seen ideas like that in the Spider-man films. Some of the imagery is reminiscent of Nolans Batman films. The destruction? Matrix films. before anyone complains that doesn't all mean the film will be bad. Just pointing out that the publics seen a lot of this before. Thats not good or bad.
Something like STM had never even been ATTEMPTED before so it certainly couldn't be classified as a trend follower. It MADE the freaking trend thats been followed by many films ever since. I would imagine people knew pretty quickly that STM was something different. There had never been a serious big budget superhero film before. Ever.
This wasn't Batman 66. It clearly wasn't Barbarella.
And Batman 89 DID make an impact as soon as its first trailer hit. That alone started the second wave of Bat-mania. When people go to a movie just to see that trailer and not the movie its attached to its doing something special. Before it even came out it was changing the way certain people thought of comic book movies or at least batman as a character. Most people thought of Adam West. Batman 89 clearly wasn't Adam West's Batman.
TV shows and movies were following trends it set shortly after its release. Darkman. The Flash. Both out the year after Batman's release.
It made such a big impact that Batman was name dropped...in a Punisher movie. Considering when Captain America was filmed it HAD to be influenced by the ideas coming out of Batman's production before it was even released. Putting Matt Salinger in a molded rubber suit was not a coincidence.
Avengers was also immediately a trend setter. Name a team up Super hero film that did what Avengers did. It had never been done before. Not that way.
What I'm saying has no bearing on the quality of the released film. It could be great. But does anyone have any SERIOUS expectations that this is going to be Batman/Dark Knight/Spider-man/Avengers sized monster blockbuster? That might be setting yourself up for disappointment.
It seems to be following on from things Nolan did with Batman and even his first Batman film didn't beak the bank. It did solid business though. Again not a mark against MOS. Just sayin.
|
|
|
|
Post by eccentricbeing on Dec 15, 2012 19:35:10 GMT -5
But it can't have serious expectations like those movies. Those movies had development of anticipation that took a few years. Particular the Nolan's Batman movie, Avengers, and even Spider-Man.
If anything, Man of Steel is in the same boat as Batman Begins....trying to respark a franchise that's been dead in the water. I vividly remembered not being impressed by the production of Batman Begins. I didn't know the plot, but from the production photos, trailers, and the idea of a new Batman movie that could suck like the other ones kinda turned me off. It didn't stop me from seeing it opening night and within the first 10 minutes, I tugged my friend's arm and said, "Holy shit...this movie is fucking awesome."
It's cool to judge what you see in the trailers. It's fun. But it's not the real representation of what we're going to see opening night. Trend setting or not....all films and artists copy each other.
|
|
Metallo
New Member
The worlds finest heroes
Posts: 17,078
|
Post by Metallo on Dec 17, 2012 9:51:39 GMT -5
Aaaaand you missed my point entirely. Its not about just copying or taking inspiration. But treading new ground instead of retreading some of the same ground. or at least treading new ground while retreading some of the same ground. As some have said a lot of this looks like SR mixed with Smallville mixed with Batman Begins only with much larger set pieces. So much so that even a lot of die hard flag waivers for this film said that initial silhouetted teaser poster of Cavill looked like something right out of the Superman Returns ad campaign. But we've seen large set pieces in superhero films before. But rehashings been WB's MO for almost 25 years when it comes to the DC characters.
STM and Batman took inspiration from a lot of things but they were radical in breaking new ground in a way MOS doesn't appear to be so far. Maybe that will change wit MOS. I said before but but again you ignored the fact that there had never BEEN a superhero movie that looked like STM. The same for Batman. There hadn't been very many superhero movies period before STM or batman. MOS doesn't look much different than Nolan's Batman or Webbs Spider-man. That has no bearing on how entertaining the movie is but we've seen a lot of it before.
What MARVEL did with Phase one is what WB did with Superman and Batman in the late 70's and 80's. THEY are now the trend setters. Was there ever ANYTHING like The Avengers buildup/Phase one with Superhero films? NO. Marvel upped the ante. Avengers was also influenced by other things but it had something incredibly new to offer that enticed people. And I knew fro, the moment I saw the first trailer that it was going to be something familiar but at the same time something groundbreaking and it was. It was a monster hit. A MONSTER hit.
Batman Begins impressed me from the moment it started.
From casting (Bale was THE guy, the heir apparent to the mantle of the bat) the tone and the story it told. It was treading new ground for the character so I'm not sure how anyone can say they weren't impressed by that at least. Batman's origin as a whole has NEVER been told in cartoons or movies or tv. At best it was usually fragmented over the course of any new projects run. They were tackling something that not even the animated series had done and in a big way.
Bale was so far ahead of every other contender for the role of batman it wasn't funny. And he brought to the table things that his predecessors simply couldn't. Hard to say that about Superman right now. A couple of guys have owned that Superman role in a way NO Batman actor never has. In that sense no MOS ISN'T in the same boat as Begins was in 05.
Superman had had definitive takes in a way Batman never REALLY did before Begins.
And Batman & Robin and Catwoman were much bigger disasters for the Batman franchise than Superman Returns or even Smallville were for Superman. Thats evident by the fact that we are getting a Superman reboot even faster than we got a Batman reboot. SR is polarizing. Batman & Robin is universally loathed. There never WAS a realized attempt to return to the Burtonverse on the big screen.
The fact that SR got made at all between SIV and MOS shows that it was more incompetence behind the scenes that kept Superman down. Stronger attempts were made to bring him back than with Batman. Burtons Superman got farther than Aronofsky's Batman. Between SIV and MOS here were MORE live action Superman projects in the interim (SUPERBOY, LOIS & CLARK, Smallville) than there were between B&R and Begins (Birds of prey) so that right there the character has been far more viable and VISIBLE even after disappointments than Batman. The failures of the Batman franchise were worse and the dormancy of the character from the big screen was far more evident and far more embarrassing.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2012 10:31:43 GMT -5
good thing about Nolan's name being on it is it will instantly hook all the sheep who jumped on the batman bandwagon to be cool. OMFG NOLAN!!! ITS PROBARBLY GUNA BE DA BESTEST FILM EVER FILMED.
Exaggerating but you get the point
So financially that's a big bonus.
|
|
atp
New Member
Resident Troll
Posts: 6,823 
|
Post by atp on Dec 17, 2012 12:40:14 GMT -5
Bale was so far ahead of every other contender for the role of batman it wasn't funny. And he brought to the table things that his predecessors simply couldn't. Hard to say that about Superman right now. A couple of guys have one guy has owned that Superman role in a way NO Batman actor never has. fixed |
|
