|
Post by Scissorpuppy on Dec 22, 2013 11:48:14 GMT -5
So when are these screentests going to leak in full? These screen caps are just teases.
|
|
|
Post by EnriqueH on Dec 22, 2013 19:40:13 GMT -5
Not sure how a Abrams Superman would turn out, but there's ONE thing I can virtually GUARANTEE:
The chicks would be HOT.
I was just rewatching Star Trek Into Darkness.
Ooof, Abrams has great taste in broads. Zoe Saldana, the Carol Marcus chick. Shit, the green chick in ST 09 is hotter than all the Nolan chicks COMBINED.
|
|
Melv
New Member
Posts: 546
|
Post by Melv on Dec 22, 2013 20:48:55 GMT -5
Good thing there are some directors with a bit of integrity that don't think women or 'chicks' as you call them are purely there to add to your wank bank.
|
|
Metallo
New Member
The worlds finest heroes
Posts: 17,078
|
Post by Metallo on Dec 22, 2013 20:52:45 GMT -5
Not sure how a Abrams Superman would turn out, but there's ONE thing I can virtually GUARANTEE: The chicks would be HOT. I was just rewatching Star Trek Into Darkness. Ooof, Abrams has great taste in broads. Zoe Saldana, the Carol Marcus chick. Shit, the green chick in ST 09 is hotter than all the Nolan chicks COMBINED. Saldana is too skinny for my tastes. Roddenberry being the womanizer he was at least got quite a few ladies with some nice curves on TOS. You're a fan so you know what I'm talking bout.
|
|
|
Post by EnriqueH on Dec 22, 2013 21:54:47 GMT -5
Good thing there are some directors with a bit of integrity that don't think women or 'chicks' as you call them are purely there to add to your wank bank. What does integrity have to do with admiring and appreciating a beautiful woman as opposed to a not-so-beautiful woman?
|
|
Melv
New Member
Posts: 546
|
Post by Melv on Dec 23, 2013 0:51:37 GMT -5
Women are about more than their looks. Maybe? No? Heard that before?
|
|
|
Post by EnriqueH on Dec 23, 2013 7:25:26 GMT -5
That's cute. Very quaint.
But believe me, looks are EVERYTHING.
|
|
Melv
New Member
Posts: 546
|
Post by Melv on Dec 23, 2013 13:17:56 GMT -5
You shouldn't have put up those pictures of yourself before then. I feel sorry for you if that's what you honestly think.
|
|
|
Post by EnriqueH on Dec 23, 2013 16:45:13 GMT -5
Me?
I'm beautiful, baby.
You'd eat my ass with a spoon.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2013 0:31:59 GMT -5
I dunno. I'm siding with Enrique on this one. I'm not going to get to know these actresses or anything. They're in the movie to give me something nice to look at. heck, I didn't give two shits to see "Thor" until I saw Natalie Portman was in it. Maggie Gyllenhall has never made me think twice about seeing a movie. Otherwise ... damn, I might as well watch WWE Divas wrestling matches for their technical skills and expert submissions, not because a titty may pop out on live TV.
|
|
Melv
New Member
Posts: 546
|
Post by Melv on Dec 24, 2013 15:57:19 GMT -5
Performance is more important than looks every time. Otherwise you'd cast bimbos in everything. (It does happen, but when it does it's usually bad because it's done for the wrong reasons.)
Gyllanhall was infinitely more convincing than Holmes.
|
|
|
Post by EnriqueH on Dec 24, 2013 16:16:35 GMT -5
Performance is important , no doubt.
But so are looks.
I don't want Nicolas Cage as Superman, Idris Elba as Bond, Tony Jaa as Blade or Amy Adams as Lois Lane.
|
|