crown
New Member
Posts: 1,226
|
Post by crown on Jun 13, 2023 0:43:45 GMT -5
Would he have been able to create CGI villains back in 1980? Probably didn't have the technology until 1993. If they could make a CGI dinosaur I don't think a CGI Terrance Stamp Sarah Douglas and Jack O'Halloran would have been too difficult either. Bigger question is, how do you convincingly portray "ruling the world" with just a 20 second sequence of key monuments being destroyed? How does the mere act destroying key monuments equate to "ruling" the world?
|
|
|
Post by crazy_asian_man on Jun 14, 2023 18:38:51 GMT -5
Would he have been able to create CGI villains back in 1980? Probably didn't have the technology until 1993. If they could make a CGI dinosaur I don't think a CGI Terrance Stamp Sarah Douglas and Jack O'Halloran would have been too difficult either. Bigger question is, how do you convincingly portray "ruling the world" with just a 20 second sequence of key monuments being destroyed? How does the mere act destroying key monuments equate to "ruling" the world? Hmn.... cgi humans still weren't too convincing for awhile, if I recall right, around that time. Recently saw a bts on Avatar 2 that talked about facial mo-cap being even more sophisticated--- what I would love (If I were a rich man) is to see the actors do facial mo-cap so that we'd get a lot of the nuances of closeups during the Metro battle. There's seconds in the slivers of the Donner cut/extended cut with the rage between Superman and Non in the extended FOS bit. Love to have seen how it would have been had we had the full sequence under Donner for the Metro battle in the first place. But- again, I guess we're lucky we even got a few seconds, given the situation. Oh well...
|
|