crown
New Member
Posts: 1,226
|
Post by crown on Jun 26, 2023 3:19:45 GMT -5
The daily planet hadn’t made any money in 3 years. If he didn’t sex up the paper there would BE no paper soon. It’s true the common man is an idiot and only reads the headlines so the headlines need to be sensational to get the point across to the common mans tiny brain. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by Kamdan on Jun 26, 2023 7:01:55 GMT -5
Imagine how much more in trouble they would have been without Superman stories to headline their papers. It felt pretty exploitative at the end with their “WE’RE BACK” headline with a random picture of Superman complimenting it.
|
|
crown
New Member
Posts: 1,226
|
Post by crown on Jun 26, 2023 14:43:43 GMT -5
Imagine how much more in trouble they would have been without Superman stories to headline their papers. It felt pretty exploitative at the end with their “WE’RE BACK” headline with a random picture of Superman complimenting it. I also wonder why Jimmy felt that he could just GIVE a batch of newspapers to Warfield free of charge. Jimmy was just a lowly photographer and lacked the authority to give newspapers away for free. Besides as a minority shareholder I’m sure Warfield was entitled to take copies of the paper as he pleased without needing permission from Jimmy. Bigger question is did Mr White ever pay off his loan to the bank? In about 10 years when the Internet came along, was taking out a credit line for a majority stakehold in a newspaper be a wise investment? Mr White likely defaulted in the loan and was rendered destitute giving blow jobs for pocket change in the front of the daily planet. |
|
