|
|
Post by MAVERICK on Feb 2, 2009 14:54:23 GMT -5
I love the diamond pattern on the Blue.
I'm indifferent about the "S" pattern on the "S".
|
|
|
|
Post by adam15 on Feb 3, 2009 19:34:50 GMT -5
Maybe in the next one they can have Supes have S shields all over his costume ala the Riddler!  |
|
|
|
Post by MAVERICK on Feb 3, 2009 19:36:55 GMT -5
Nah. I like the diamonds.
|
|
|
|
Post by adam15 on Feb 5, 2009 14:36:34 GMT -5
Seriously people, if they do reboot the Superman franchise and make another series of films with another actor, will you still be glad that SR was made? I think it'll be sorta a misfit film...
|
|
Legsy
New Member
Alright, alright, alright...
Posts: 15,339
|
Post by Legsy on Feb 5, 2009 14:51:47 GMT -5
For the most part, people here LOVE SR. I love everything about the movie. If there's a reboot, I'm still going to check it out. I'm a Superman fan, not just a Donnerverse fan. So, in the event there's a reboot, I'll check it out with an open mind. I may love it or I may hate it. If I love this "reboot" I will still be glad SR happened. If I hate it and most people hate it, I'm going to write the WB one simple letter with one simple picture.  |
|
|
|
Post by adam15 on Feb 5, 2009 16:21:21 GMT -5
Well I seriously think that they are gonna do another Superman franchise and they're gonna get it right this time.
And I just worry that SR will be forgotten and lost between two Superman series.
|
|
Legsy
New Member
Alright, alright, alright...
Posts: 15,339
|
Post by Legsy on Feb 5, 2009 16:50:57 GMT -5
It may or may not, only time will tell.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimbo on Feb 5, 2009 16:52:53 GMT -5
Rebooting Superman is a stupid idea just from a cost standpoint. They already have the art design, sets, and props. Rebooting would mean incurring all those expenses over again.
If they do reboot, I hope they're stuck in production heck for 10 years. Serves them right for running with a stupid idea. (See also Superman movie production 1990-2004)
|
|
Legsy
New Member
Alright, alright, alright...
Posts: 15,339
|
Post by Legsy on Feb 5, 2009 17:11:50 GMT -5
Ultimately it's going to be Horns' decision to make. Robinov is a moron. Luckily, Horn has always been supportive of both Routh and Singer.
|
|
|
|
Post by adam15 on Feb 5, 2009 23:09:13 GMT -5
U guys think maybe Nolan would do a good Superman origin story ala Batman Begins? Maybe Nolan's heightened reality would be a good contrast to Donner's fairy tale.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimbo on Feb 5, 2009 23:54:15 GMT -5
No, he doesn't have the right mindset. Superman movies shouldn't be dark, pessimistic and gritty.
|
|
|
|
Post by adam15 on Feb 6, 2009 0:04:57 GMT -5
No, he doesn't have the right mindset. Superman movies shouldn't be dark, pessimistic and gritty. like Superman Returns wasn't? Maybe a darker approach could have worked if Superman truly came back to a more dangerous world where people were dying in SR. The choice that Batman makes in Dark Knight: what is going to far? WOuld be great for Superman cause he CAN fix anything so the temptation is so great to just clean up the streets by brute force but then he'd become just like them |
|
|
|
Post by Jimbo on Feb 6, 2009 0:09:16 GMT -5
A Superman movie with Michael Bay-style fight editing and a non-score, no thanks.
|
|
Legsy
New Member
Alright, alright, alright...
Posts: 15,339
|
Post by Legsy on Feb 6, 2009 0:11:26 GMT -5
You know what Michael Bay did to me.  |
|
|
|
Post by Jor-L5150 on Feb 6, 2009 0:24:05 GMT -5
i am glad that SR happened.
i am MORE glad that several other superman movies didn't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jimbo on Feb 6, 2009 0:29:47 GMT -5
You know what Michael Bay did to me. Michael Bay, have a seat over there, please. |
|
|
|
Post by stargazer01 on Feb 6, 2009 0:38:41 GMT -5
i am glad that SR happened. i am MORE glad that several other superman movies didn't. Well said! Well, everybody here already knows that I'm SO GLAD that SR happened. Superb movie, sequel or not. I rather have one great Superman movie than several shitty-no substance-all flashy-action flicks pretending to be Superman movies. |
|
|
|
Post by Jor-L5150 on Feb 6, 2009 0:58:11 GMT -5
well.. tim burton's zombie-superman would have been ( morbidly ) fascinating. - but ONLY if WB were cranking out superman movies the way SAW movies get released every few weeks. THEN we might indulge an oddball elseworld movie.
yeah, i'm all about verisimilitude and glass-half-full.
|
|
|
|
Post by MAVERICK on Feb 6, 2009 2:37:39 GMT -5
i am glad that SR happened. i am MORE glad that several other superman movies didn't. Well said! Well, everybody here already knows that I'm SO GLAD that SR happened. Superb movie, sequel or not. I rather have one great Superman movie than several shitty-no substance-all flashy-action flicks pretending to be Superman movies. Exaaaaaaaaaactly  |
|
|
|
Post by adam15 on Feb 6, 2009 2:51:14 GMT -5
U dudes r missing da point. They are gonna do a whole new SERIES of Superman films. Our generation will have the Reeve films, the next will have the new series. Who will take ownership of SR? It'll be like a bidding time film... to hold us over to the next series. OR they could opt to continue with SR... but it'll be hard since the film was already a kinda of sequel /remake itself so its a shaky foundation to start a new set of films. Plus they'll have to work in Jason...uggghh do we really need to have a daddy Superman??? They should just start again; when/if they do will you still be happy that SR was made cuz it'll have no real place or fit in anywhere
|
|
ye5man
New Member
1%
Posts: 7,928
|
Post by ye5man on Feb 6, 2009 8:46:22 GMT -5
I was disapointed by SR, but not because it could have been worse - which is crap justification.
I was disapointed because (unsuprisingly) I thought it should have been so much better.
Ah well, let's hope a new writer, director, editor and DP take over; if that means replacing Routh too then a shame but so be it.
|
|
atp
New Member
Resident Troll
Posts: 6,823 
|
Post by atp on Feb 6, 2009 11:19:55 GMT -5
I rather have one great Superman movie than several shitty-no substance-all flashy-action flicks pretending to be Superman movies. I guess they should have stopped in 1978 then...  |
|
Legsy
New Member
Alright, alright, alright...
Posts: 15,339
|
Post by Legsy on Feb 6, 2009 11:23:04 GMT -5
LOL!
But, then we wouldn't have the cgi! Please?
|
|
|
|
Post by stargazer01 on Feb 6, 2009 11:57:24 GMT -5
I rather have one great Superman movie than several shitty-no substance-all flashy-action flicks pretending to be Superman movies. I guess they should have stopped in 1978 then... hehe.. ;D cute joke. |
|
|
|
Post by adam15 on Feb 8, 2009 5:00:34 GMT -5
Who was Ricky's father? Was it Brad? Please tell me if this was obvious... because I never knew.
edit:: oh I just remembered Donald was prolly his Dad... but I thought I read something on the main site that SIII had a somber overtone that coulda been delved into more regarding Ricky and his alcoholic father (so it'd be Brad??)... maybe I misread it.
|
|
